|Source: Federal audits and other documents|
In October 2011, I filed a Freedom of Information Act request for information about a tiny chunk of that - a $750,000 program called "Breaking the Information Blockade."
Two years later, the State Department sent me a batch of heavily censored documents.
The July 14, 2006, executive summary of IRI's project proposal is redacted. The next page gives some background, describing the "information blockade" in place in Cuba since the early 1960s. The documents reads, in part:
Dissidents in Cuba who work to break the information blockade are limited by the repressive tactics of the Castro regime and its sympathizers, as well as by the Cuban government's restrictions on travel in and out of Cuba. Thus, most successful efforts at breaking the information blockade have required the support of the Cuban exile community, foreign governments and international NGOs.Much of the document, including the project budget, is redacted. The image below gives you a graphic idea of what the State Department sent me.
The regime's censorship policy is facilitated by the fact that Cuba is an island, which effectively prevents the importation of print and electronic media, media technology and media devices. This physical bottleneck on the flow of information into Cuba, combined with the repressiveness of Cuban state security, the surveillance carried out by regime sympathizers, and the economic situation of most Cubans, work together to very effectively limit the flow of information into Cuba.
...the information blockade is a vital component of the regime's efforts to restrict freedom of thought and expression, and suppress citizen initiatives for democratic change.
...breaking the information blockade is fundamental to democratic change in Cuba.
The documents give no details on how the IRI spent $750,000 toward breaking the "information blockade."
I thought the U.S. Agency for International Development, which financed the controversial ZunZuneo project, was secretive. Maybe the State Department is even worse (or better, depending on your point of view).
Whatever the case, the State Department has been even slower than USAID in responding to FOIA requests that I began filing in December 2010.
Maybe I should apply for a grant to try to break the State Department's "information blockade."
P.S. If you'd like to get the flavor for what unredacted IRI documents are like, below are three samples, first published on Miradas Encontradas:
- Hastening the Transition to Democracy in Cuba (15 MB)
- IRI Work Plan, 2008-2009 (24.7 MB)
- Sectors of Change - Cuba (8.5 MB)
In one document, IRI said it had hoped to put 10 BGAN satellite Internet modems in operation, but was likely going to reduce that number. The document read:
Due primarily to the risks involved in transporting these devices, IRI has not yet identified a suitable partner to receive and test the equipment....
IRI continues to assess its budget in this respect, and will make recommendations to USAID as long term prospects become clearer.